Friends don't gaslight you
- Amanda Riddell
.jpg/v1/fill/w_320,h_320/file.jpg)
- Jul 20
- 2 min read
I don't trust those people. I didn't create my porn accounts to mock people, or to pitch. Did I really want to see what half of Wellington thought of me? No, I didn't.
People needed to say it to my face, and they still need to.
-
All the double talk is exhausting. Despite your shock, my dick wasn't visible, and how dare you tell me to 'pass with care' for freeballing a long skirt on a windless day?
Those signs trigger me cos they are probably intentional. Nobody saw it.
A skirt with two layers, one of which is dark black. So, apologise for using your hidden camera to deduce when I'm wearing underwear. Speak these complaints in English, or accept that you're bullying me and you don't have enough proof to convict.
You can't ask me to make the Tina film to 'learn' - again, that is illegal.
Prove your claims, or accept that the key word is intention.
To prove those claims, you would need proof of intentional exposure.
If these claims of 'tuck or die' are ever brought up again, 'die' is rising up the list.
-
Tory, you are a transphobic snake and admitting it is the first step to meeting me IRL.
Deliver an apology, Green women that are stalking me to convict me for shaming them.
You're unable to win, and so am I, but we both know what happened. I'm fairly sure that you'll be writing me a cheque for that Q&A statement, and that's the real reason that you chose to step down.
Tory overstepped and her friends can't produce my work as a consequence of their involvement in this illegal stalking. I wasn't charged or convicted of a crime, so you need to behave as if that is the reality, rather than behaving as if I was convicted.
Innocent until proven guilty. - Drag queens, Tory and Red Scare, you lose. I refuse to conform, and nobody has been able to charge me over any claims of indecent exposure. Repeating those claims in public, as you did during the 2022 hate roast, is exactly as slanderous as what Ray Chung did recently: none of those incidents were brought up with me during any point in the last several years. 24/7 surveillance, but that shit was only visible in their porn feed. It clearly had no evidence base, as the police have never investigated it, and I'm sure that it would have come up when the Greens were considering charging me. If my enemies walk away from this with shattered reputations, that's the intention, which is why they're now considering defamation. But they'll lose: this rant follows Tory's clear defamatory slur on Q&A. My actions could be seen as a result of the statement, which would work in my favour and may result in further emotional damages. Perhaps Cass shouldn't have made those DeviantArt profiles? Perhaps Salina shouldn't have hosted her own persuasion hui? The ones that I think I could charge are the ones that annoy me the most.
Comments