Was I in Dirty Work?

Haven't bought it yet, but people are intimating that I got a brief mention. If it's to do with my ongoing case, then that evidence is real. I made it publicly available, and it's been gathered as part of a real police investigation. I've also made the case number public, so it should be easy to research. My instance was a combination of intimidation and sexual extortion. The case is 250126/0248. - Haven't heard from the frontline officers in a few months, but the evidence is thinner now. The bad guys have altered their tactics since the change in stalking/harassment laws. I was told to keep pressing them after the law change, hoping they'd slip up. They did, but since then it's been stalled; high-profile politicians are implicated. The police are keen for me to present my evidence of being sexually assaulted to them, so Tika is launching just in time. I'm not sure how it fits in, but bear in mind that my case has entertainment law components as well as unauthorised surveillance by the GCSB. A bunch of people with National/ACT connections blackmailed me over a screenplay. This was aided by their Beehive friends using their influence to target me. Here's all the evidence: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1o1fvViIv1gNG7N_BXcmY13aMQA1HmwFA?usp=sharing - How do they do it? Well, I'm alleging that the SIS use experimental AI to target myself and other well-known activists with alternative sexual lifestyles. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pT8S0stGwig2jtB17GzP1wKi6tQPL_F8/view?usp=sharing While ChatGPT is touting itself, the Five Eyes were years ahead of us until recently. Their data sets are virtually infinite and there's no ethics board. They have every digital communication that we've ever received; every website that we've ever visited; they can even turn on our webcams and phone cams remotely in order to track our eyeballs as we do our daily business. Unlike Nicky, I don't have to allege that they planted bugs or raided my flat, though it's possible that those things are true as well. Gary said that they presume they can surveil drug activists without a warrant. It's intended to discourage us, and was difficult to prove. It required taking screenshots as I masturbated online. He said to use this in the future: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ - If you find the content of my porn evidence to be somehow disgusting, I agree. As I said in The Dakumentary, I'm a masochist. I can get off to shit that creeps me out. The point is how it's obviously using my likeness and my visual art as a springboard. The point isn't whether you approve of the pornography I enjoy, but the targeting and how it relates to the credible harassment evidence from my email account. The sisytah self-confidence captions were a real spank bank folder - the first 50 or so numbered images - that was later expanded with the AI porn that was flooding my feed. Unfortunately, that's only the palatable stuff that I was able to cum to. Search by date modified.