top of page

Amanda vs. sleazy producers

  • Writer: Amanda Riddell
    Amanda Riddell
  • Feb 16
  • 1 min read

Look, if you do this again, I'll probably end up with enough evidence to charge you. By May 2026, harassment = two actions within the last two years. I've already got a ton of evidence, but it's largely background. If you attack me now, then it'll become actionable. - Accept that I'm not making Weeded Out. Accept that you can't steal my IP without fighting me in court. Get used to the idea of me as someone with money. I'm not performing in large part thanks to your continued efforts. Wellington needs to accept that Tory lost her feud with me. Why? She said things that were actionable in civil court. The bad press regarding her defamatory Q&A statement made her unelectable. TVNZ's producers said they offered to cut it, and she insisted on it. - Yes, I know it's scary: Amanda as a business partner with Peter and Fran. I don't care about BATS, but Fran wants you all to grow a pair and say sorry to me. Haven't officially signed, but the Beatles script has been very well-received.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Why won't I help people?

Because they're treating me as a disposable freak that they need to use to get rich. Bluntly, that money should be mine. If we're talking Beatles, it's simple: My script was better. My demos were ee

 
 
 
Rhyming like the Beatles

Their rhyming is sloppy by 1950's standards, but very tight by 2020's standards. It's more proto-punk than sloppy: they deconstruct pop in their early albums. They were beat kids being clever by moc

 
 
 

1 Comment


Amanda Riddell
Amanda Riddell
Feb 16

Those new rules, incidentally, are why I'm not coming to Question Time. Luxon is notoriously thin-skinned, and I don't want to be arrested on a trumped-up charge.

Edited
Like
bottom of page