top of page

Amanda vs. sleazy producers

  • Writer: Amanda Riddell
    Amanda Riddell
  • 4 hours ago
  • 1 min read

Look, if you do this again, I'll probably end up with enough evidence to charge you. By May 2026, harassment = two actions within the last two years. I've already got a ton of evidence, but it's largely background. If you attack me now, then it'll become actionable. - Accept that I'm not making Weeded Out. Accept that you can't steal my IP without fighting me in court. Get used to the idea of me as someone with money. I'm not performing in large part thanks to your continued efforts. Wellington needs to accept that Tory lost her feud with me. Why? She said things that were actionable in civil court. The bad press regarding her defamatory Q&A statement made her unelectable. TVNZ's producers said they offered to cut it, and she insisted on it. - Yes, I know it's scary: Amanda as a business partner with Peter and Fran. I don't care about BATS, but Fran wants you all to grow a pair and say sorry to me. Haven't officially signed, but the Beatles script has been very well-received.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
To the Sony executives

I don't want a bribe. I'm not interested in doubling Paul: it's far too much work for far too little pay. I'm 31, not 17. Flying to London because your actors can't play guitar is stupid. Perhaps yo

 
 
 
Amanda Michelina 2

Is the first of my pop albums to be influenced by Golriz. Shouldn't be so surprising: she's in the film.

 
 
 
Empty threats, empty promises

That's all I ever get from the chardonnay socialists. The one threat they managed to follow through on was the FTAC referral. That was only possible because Tory and Nadine worked at Parliament. I t

 
 
 

1 Comment


Amanda Riddell
Amanda Riddell
4 hours ago

Those new rules, incidentally, are why I'm not coming to Question Time. Luxon is notoriously thin-skinned, and I don't want to be arrested on a trumped-up charge.

Edited
Like
bottom of page