top of page
Search

'Why won't you be Tina?'

  • Writer: Amanda Riddell
    Amanda Riddell
  • 5 hours ago
  • 1 min read

It doesn't work like that. Once you accept that AI didn't write my script or songs, then you have to accept the primacy of copyright law in all jurisdictions. Are my copyrights suddenly invalid because I'm a New Zealander? Does making Working For Each Other disqualify me from IP rights? Steve Barr is a sleazy creep who tried to steal my idea and make money from it. Let's focus on that truth, rather than being pawns of the Trump or Luxon administration. I own the rights to my Deep Dream Generator images, by the way.

Recent Posts

See All
A bitchy comment

Modern opera has no drama; modern musicals have no music. Both are tedious, live and on video. I see my style as akin to Third Stream music. - None of my shows are neatly defined as either musicals

 
 
 
Why are the UK police minimising Sir Paul?

He's backing a lot of pro-Palestine groups, so it's akin to funding terrorism. As a result, they're keen for the Mendes films to get him out of the way. If it's come to using Photoshop to hide his in

 
 
 

1 Comment

Amanda Riddell
Amanda Riddell
5 hours ago

You have to stop saying being Tina = a left-wing victory. 1. No. The election is in under five months -- the series wouldn't air until 2027. 2. No. AMPP is actually helping swing the polls leftward. 3. No. My copyrights are ultimately more important than an election. Remember the plum that Mr. Barr and others were chasing: Outrageous Fortune. They wanted Pose or Outrageous Fortune money + international Emmys. The Dakumentary won zero Emmys, but it's had a huge impact. Weeded Out material was used in The Dakumentary; ergo, I've fulfilled the brief. Ample video of myself is available, but none of it can create a convincing deepfake. They'd be using them against me if it could...

Edited
Like
bottom of page