The Life of a Showgirl: The Encore
.jpg/v1/fill/w_320,h_320/file.jpg)
Yeah, they're definitely using AI on Taylor's tracks.
The rhythm isn't right in Patient Zero or Cleveland! Sounds like Emanuel's recent songs.
Quantised grooves and syncopation that doesn't really work. Telltale signs.
The drums in Cleveland are particularly obvious.
The lyrics aren't strong either; reeks of too many cooks (like the title track).
-
When Sir Peter did Now and Then, it was just ML.
The violin in Patient Zero sounds suspiciously like Emanuel's in The Hand In Mine.
-
Babylon was a bit stronger, but still weaker than the tracks from the album.
This feels like a cash grab and a reaction to Baby Face.
Taylor's basically saying that she's done with the pop singer thing with that film idea.
Her management aren't happy; their livelihoods depend on her career.
Mx. Swift wants to write a real musical, not some lame pop biopic.
On the plus side, they haven't used any songs she's writing for our film.
This, Stella and other kids of the Beatles, is why your parents are fighting tooth and nail. They don't want AI clones of Beatles songs proliferating. Mine are totally original, sans AI. Shit like this cheapens the brand and devalues their legacy. Shit like mine is reviving interest in the band and making millions and millions of dollars.
To make a point: I'm putting money into the band with my mahi; you're extracting wealth. When your fashion line sells itself or your other businesses are profitable, then you privileged trust fund babies won't need to collude with film studios to protect your fragile senses of self. - Bottom line: the studios are willing to kill your parents. That's not on. You'll make short-term gains for long-term…