Evidence of interference

Well, we've seen the hundreds and hundreds of pornographic images. We've seen the blackmail threats. We've seen the giant billboards that were erected to fuck with AMPP. We've seen targeted subscription emails being sent despite not having subscribed. This year, I've been taken off the air three times for spurious reasons. The first one was over deliberately literal interpretations of offhanded comments. The second one was over copyright violations. The third one was over copyright violations. These things have nothing to do with the substance of AMPP's campaign. That's why Meta put me back on the air within a day after a three-month ban. The new profile isn't likely to face copyright issues: I've got plenty of AMPP material. - My ads are well within the bounds of our laws. My campaign on the streets is also legal. The proof is in the pudding: my harassment claims are now a frontline investigation. VUW was the first group that I brought to their attention. The political parties and Red Scare were reported when they ticked me off. This isn't a conspiracy theory: it's factual enough to cause an investigation. Calling me crazy isn't a good answer: I'm not infallible, but I'm pretty sharp. - Calling the PM a prick and suggesting a snap election isn't illegal. Calling my enemies untalented isn't very sporting, but isn't illegal. They made their own bed by nicking my songs and stories. I'd suggest that Reuters and the Guardian have better things to do than trolling me. Same goes for Stuff. - To reiterate: there is no win-win. You lot played a zero-sum game and cheated. There is no compromise that involves my IP being used by others. There is no compromise that doesn't involve honest assessments of wrongdoing. There is no compromise that involves me being an actor or singer for others. If I'm about to get rich and you're not, it's probably because my IP is worth something. Salina and Cassandra and all the political wankers need to find a new hobby.