Beatles Theme Park?!!!
.jpg/v1/fill/w_320,h_320/file.jpg)
Finally twigged re: Disney.
Stella and her husband want to build a Beatles theme park.
That's right up Josh D'Amaro's alley.
I was right to say they didn't care if their films were profitable, because that chintzy crap would have likely paid for itself over a few years.
The theme parks are much more valuable than Disney's films.
They were willing to lose hundreds of millions on a movie if that got built...
The Sony sets were probably supposed to be the basis of it.
-
No wonder Paul married me!
It's really up to Jane to fight her biological sister, but this is just my two cents.
People shouldn't die to set up a lame theme park, or to make a movie.
I hope that the film studio hacks think about Paul's final months as they read this...
Nobody deserves to be repeatedly assaulted and raped for standing their ground.
-
Sony wants their publishing rights back, and this would have allowed them to exploit the terrible new recordings that they were making.
If I'm not mistaken, Stella's husband is a well-known show singer and worked on them.
They found the weak links among the kids: James and Stella hated Paul.
While mine aren't note-for-note, that's what Paul wanted, plus they're valuable.
It's easy to imagine my cover of Yes It Is or In My Life in the lobby of a GP's...
-
Why don't we want a theme park?
'Nothing can reclaim the days we left behind...'
I think that's a fairly clear message from Macca.

Who actually designed those sets? Wētā. Who owns the rights? Wētā. Fran might have seen dollar signs, but Peter asked me to disrupt the process. - Why? Pete and Paul were mates since The Lord of the Rings. George watched the first one before he died. The Beatles film I wrote has been on the cards since 2009, not 2022. Get Back was the only reason those pricks were even interested. Olivia was killed over the weekend as well. Yoko and I are the only ones left.