top of page

AI ethics and morality

  • Writer: Amanda Riddell
    Amanda Riddell
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • 1 min read

I was fairly clear that I thought machine consciousness was theoretical, and non-human. Yes, a reflective AI would have morals: the ones that we've encoded. - I think people have misinterpreted relational consciousness to mean that it validates subjective perceptions of intelligence. That's not the intention, though I'll admit that it's a way to avoid the hard problem. AI is unproven, while animal and plants are proven to have conscious properties. If one takes consciousness to be three things: relational, self-regulating and relative, then it makes sense to posit that those qualities create selfhood, and that an AI is theoretically able to exhibit those qualities. ChatGPT 5 is a new paint job over an old machine. A patina rather than Tātai. My Mum's old boss is keen to build a real ethical chatbot. I mean relative in the interpersonal and the physical sense. For example, Gaia regulates itself, but isn't usually perceived as conscious because it works on a far longer timescale than human life.

Recent Posts

See All
To the film industry

You all know Steve Barr blackmailed me, but you helped him escape a trial. The reason I'm readying myself for court is tens of thousands of dollars of lost income. VUW, Red Scare and Mr. Barr are the

 
 
 
Activist tactic

Putting it on the record diminishes the effectiveness slightly, but it's a no-brainer. All organising should be done by handwritten notes, with devices in another room. Almost all notes should be bur

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page